Derivation of Negative Apparent Mass and Effective Mass Relationship in Extended Classical Mechanics (ECM)

1. Motivation

Classical mechanics accounts for force and motion using invariant matter mass. However, gravitational phenomena reveal that interaction energy alters inertia and gravitational coupling without creating new matter.

Extended Classical Mechanics (ECM) resolves this by introducing Negative Apparent Mass (NAM), a dynamical mass-equivalent associated with manifested interaction energy.

2. Energetic Foundation of ECM

ECM is built on an explicit energy redistribution principle:

−ΔPEᴇᴄᴍ ↔ ΔKEᴇᴄᴍ ↔ ΔMᴍ

No independent gravitational field-energy entity is introduced. All gravitationally relevant energy is internalized within mass terms.

|

3. Derivation of Negative Apparent Mass (NAM)

When potential energy is released during gravitational interaction, the system exhibits increased dynamical response without an increase in matter content.

ECM identifies this manifested interaction energy as a negative apparent mass:

Mᵃᵖᵖ ≡ −ΔPEᴇᴄᴍ / c²    (sign reflects repulsive manifestation)

NAM is not exotic matter. It is an energetic mass-equivalent representing manifested interaction.

|

4. Effective Mass in ECM

The net mass governing acceleration and gravitational coupling in ECM is the effective mass:

Mᵉᶠᶠ = Mᴍ + (−Mᵃᵖᵖ)

This relation is derived directly from mechanical energy redistribution, not from cosmological observation.

|

5. Relation to Dark Energy (Empirical Support)

In cosmology, observations are often summarized as:

Mɢ = Mᴍ + Mᴅᴇ

where Mᴅᴇ < 0 represents a repulsive contribution inferred from large-scale dynamics.

This relation is empirical and scale-specific. It does not derive the underlying mechanism.

|

6. Why ECM Is Independent of Dark Energy Models

The ECM relation:

Mᵉᶠᶠ = Mᴍ + (−Mᵃᵖᵖ)

is a mechanical derivation valid at all scales.

By contrast:

Mɢ = Mᴍ + Mᴅᴇ

is an observational summary. Its agreement with ECM is supportive evidence, not a defining assumption.

|

Derivation of Negative Apparent Mass and Effective Mass Relationship in ECM

−ΔPEᴇᴄᴍ −Mᵃᵖᵖ (NAM) ΔKEᴇᴄᴍ
Energy released from gravitational potential manifests as Negative Apparent Mass (NAM), which governs dynamical response without creating new matter.
−ΔPEᴇᴄᴍ ↔ −Mᵃᵖᵖ ↔ ΔKEᴇᴄᴍ
|

Figure 2: Mass Redistribution — ECM vs Empirical Dark Energy

ECM (Derived) Mᴍ (Matter Mass) −Mᵃᵖᵖ (NAM) Mᵉᶠᶠ = Mᴍ + (−Mᵃᵖᵖ) Cosmology (Empirical) Mᴍ (Matter) Mᴅᴇ < 0 Mɢ = Mᴍ + Mᴅᴇ
ECM derives effective mass mechanically via NAM, while Dark Energy relations summarize observed large-scale behavior. Agreement is empirical support, not dependence.
|

Consistency of Inertial and Gravitational Mass in ECM

In Extended Classical Mechanics (ECM), gravitational interaction energy is accounted for through explicit energetic redistribution:

−ΔPEᴇᴄᴍ ↔ ΔKEᴇᴄᴍ ↔ ΔMᴍ

Energy conservation is therefore maintained without introducing a separate gravitational field-energy density.

Within ECM, the classical quantities are not identified through the Newtonian equivalence assumption mᵢ = m𝑔. Instead, ECM distinguishes their physical roles:

mᵢ = Mᴏʀᴅ
m𝑔 = Mɢ − (Mᴅᴍ + Mᴅᴇ)

Accordingly, ECM does not require endorsement of the Newtonian gravitational field-energy density expression for internal consistency.

The assumption that consistency with mᵢ = m𝑔 mandates adoption of that field-energy expression constitutes the hybrid inconsistency analyzed in the referenced paper.

|

7. Conclusion

Extended Classical Mechanics establishes effective mass through explicit energy redistribution, introducing Negative Apparent Mass as a universal dynamical entity.

Dark Energy relations emerge as empirical confirmations of ECM behavior at cosmic scales, not as foundational inputs.

Thus, ECM provides a unified mechanical framework from laboratory dynamics to cosmology, without invoking hybrid field-energy constructs.

|