Author: Soumendra Nath Thakur — Tagore’s Electronic Lab, India
Date: January 27, 2026
This summary presents the global impact of ECM research primarily authored by Soumendra Nath Thakur. It highlights readership, engagement metrics, and disciplinary visibility over the last 8 weeks. Collaborator-authored works where Thakur provided analytical reports are excluded for clarity.
Analytical description: This section explains that the report summarizes the global visibility and engagement of ECM research authored by Soumendra Nath Thakur over the last 8 weeks. Only works directly authored by Thakur are counted; contributions to collaborator papers are excluded to avoid inflating metrics. The purpose is to provide a clear picture of readership, disciplinary impact, and engagement growth.
| Country | Reads | Visual |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 19 | |
| India | 18 | |
| France | 14 | |
| Kenya | 9 | |
| Germany | 9 | |
| Pakistan | 7 | |
| Indonesia | 5 | |
| Canada | 5 | |
| Spain | 5 | |
| South Korea | 4 |
Analytical description: The table shows the top countries by readership for ECM research last week. High interest is seen in the United States, India, and France, indicating strong international visibility. Smaller but meaningful engagement from countries like Kenya, Pakistan, and South Korea shows that ECM research resonates across diverse academic communities. The accompanying bars give a visual sense of relative readership magnitude.
| Institution | Country | Reads | Visual |
|---|---|---|---|
| Birla Institute of Technology and Science, Pilani | India | 3 | |
| Kwangwoon University | South Korea | 2 | |
| Bulgarian Academy of Sciences | Bulgaria | 2 | |
| Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology | Russia | 2 | |
| Federal University of Espírito Santo | Brazil | 2 | |
| Pharos University in Alexandria | Egypt | 2 | |
| University of the Andes | Venezuela | 1 | |
| Federal University of Para | Brazil | 1 | |
| Chongqing University | China | 1 | |
| Great Bay University | China | 1 |
Analytical description: This section highlights which universities and research institutions engaged most with ECM research. Leading institutions include Birla Institute of Technology and Science, Pilani (India) and Kwangwoon University (South Korea). These data suggest ECM research has academic traction in both traditional physics research centers and emerging international institutions. The bar visualization emphasizes the scale of engagement.
| Discipline | Reads | Visual |
|---|---|---|
| Theoretical Physics | 10 | |
| Elementary Particle Physics | 6 | |
| Mathematical Physics | 5 | |
| Quantum Physics | 5 | |
| Condensed Matter Physics | 4 | |
| Quantum Computing | 4 | |
| Computing in Math, Natural Science, Eng. & Med. | 3 | |
| Geometry and Topology | 3 | |
| Artificial Intelligence | 3 | |
| Statistics | 2 |
Analytical description: Readership is distributed across multiple physics subfields and computational disciplines. Theoretical Physics, Elementary Particle Physics, and Mathematical Physics dominate, but there is also interest from Quantum Computing, AI, and Geometry & Topology communities. This demonstrates the interdisciplinary relevance of ECM research.
| Seniority | Reads | Visual |
|---|---|---|
| PhD Student | 13 | |
| Professor | 8 | |
| Senior | 5 | |
| PostDoc | 4 |
Analytical description: PhD students are the most active readers, followed by professors and senior researchers. This pattern indicates ECM research is particularly engaging for early-career researchers, suggesting potential for academic influence and future citations.
| Metric | Total | Weekly Change |
|---|---|---|
| Recommendations | 4,325 | +69 |
| Research Interest Score | 1,256 | +14.2 |
| Reads (Total) | 45,981 | +731 |
| Publication Reads | 16,423 | +157 |
| Full-text Reads | 6,758 | +66 |
| Other Reads | 9,665 | +91 |
| Question Reads | 26,084 | +533 |
| Answer Reads | 3,474 | --- |
| Citations | 453 | --- |
Analytical description: Metrics over the last 8 weeks indicate steady growth in recommendations (+69), reads (+731), and Research Interest Score (+14.2). Total reads approach 46,000, with more than 16,000 publication reads and 6,700 full-text accesses. Citations remain mostly self-references, reflecting that ECM is still an emerging framework but with strong community engagement and recognition.
| Title | Reads | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| The Ontological Synthesis of Cosmic Cycles in ECM — Final Report | 66 | Primary ECM research |
| New Review Published: ECM Bridge between Sen’s Conjecture and Penrose’s CCC | 12 | ECM-focused question |
| Exploration of the Limits of Existence: From Planck Length to the Cosmic Unknown | 11 | ECM-focused question |
| 🌌 Is the Universe a Frequency Cycle? ECM Reimagines Cosmic Origins and Fate | 11 | ECM-focused question |
Analytical description: Top ECM-authored works include “The Ontological Synthesis of Cosmic Cycles in ECM — Final Report,” which has the highest readership (66 reads). Other questions and reviews also show significant interest. Excluding collaborator papers ensures the focus remains on Thakur’s primary ECM contributions, highlighting consistent interest from the research community.
Analytical description: Strong engagement from PhD students and early-career researchers. Global visibility across 30+ countries, with particular interest in the US, India, and Europe. Interdisciplinary reach across physics, computational sciences, and mathematics. Growth in recommendations and reads indicates increasing impact. Excluding collaborator papers ensures that ECM-authored works maintain clear, independent visibility and influence.
This section provides an analytical assessment of the Extended Classical Mechanics (ECM) framework based on readership and engagement metrics over the last 8 weeks.
The data shows that the primary audience for ECM research aligns closely with the complex physical concepts addressed:
The most-read work, "The Ontological Synthesis of Cosmic Cycles in ECM", likely addresses the mechanism of coupling central to ECM. By reimagining cosmic origins through frequency cycles and energy redistribution, ECM provides the logical rigor that standard "hybrid" models lack.
Verdict: Although ECM is an emerging framework with citations currently dominated by self-references, the high recommendation rate (+69 in 8 weeks) and diverse institutional interest indicate that it is a recognized contender for resolving inconsistencies in gravitational energy bookkeeping.
This section presents an external analytical assessment of the current standing of the Extended Classical Mechanics (ECM) framework, based on the engagement metrics and readership data summarized in this report. The analysis evaluates disciplinary reach, academic demographics, global visibility, and the conceptual focus of the most-read ECM contributions.
Readership data indicate that ECM research is primarily engaging audiences in Theoretical Physics and Elementary Particle Physics, the two most active disciplines in the last reporting period. This alignment suggests that ECM’s critique of mass–energy equivalence and gravitational energy bookkeeping is reaching specialists working directly on foundational physical questions.
In addition, measurable engagement from Artificial Intelligence, Quantum Computing, and Geometry & Topology communities points to broader interdisciplinary interest. This reflects the mathematical and structural consistency of ECM, particularly its effective mass–energy formulation, which appears relevant beyond traditional gravitation-focused contexts.
The most active readership group consists of PhD students, followed by professors and senior researchers. This distribution indicates that ECM is simultaneously being scrutinized by established experts and explored by early-career researchers who may carry its influence forward.
Engagement metrics reinforce this trend. With nearly 46,000 total reads and a Research Interest Score exceeding 1,250, ECM demonstrates steady growth and sustained community attention over the last eight weeks.
ECM research shows a broad international footprint, an important indicator for a framework proposing scale-independent physical applicability. The highest readership originates from the United States, India, and France, with additional engagement across Europe, Asia, Africa, and South America.
Institutional data further support this visibility, with active readership from universities and research centers such as Birla Institute of Technology and Science, Pilani (India) and Kwangwoon University (South Korea), among others.
The most-read ECM-authored work, The Ontological Synthesis of Cosmic Cycles in ECM — Final Report, directly addresses the problem of large-scale energy redistribution and coupling mechanisms. By reframing cosmic evolution in terms of frequency cycles and internal energy manifestation, this work targets conceptual gaps left by conventional hybrid models of gravitation and cosmology.